BIO ABLATION NOW AVAILABLE FOR ALL TYPES OF CANCER. . .
NO CHEMICALS, NO DANGEROUS RADIATION, NO SURGERY--TUMOR IS DESTROYED BIOLOGICALLY!
BEFORE YOU EXPOSE YOURSELF TO DANGEROUS CHEMICALS AND RADIATION, CHECK OUT OUR NEW TECHNOLOGY!
This young woman was sent home to die because the traditional medical approach had no answer for her.
SHE IS ALIVE TODAY THANKS TO QHM TECHNOLOGY FOUND ONLY IN ECUADOR AND CHINA!
REMOVING BREASTS WILL NOT CURE CANCER--RESEARCH INDICATES IT COULD MAKE CANCER WORSE!
RADIATION CAUSES CANCER
Mammography is a Radioactive Process.
Is Mammography safe?
NO.
Screening raises your risk of . . .cancer. Just four breast films (the usual for one session) expose you to 1 rad (radiation absorbed dose) about 1000 times more than a chest X-ray. If cancer is present, the extreme compression during a mammogram can help cancerous cells to spread (Lancet, 11992; 3440:122).As breast cancer rates continue to spiral upwards, to 185,000 women in the USA and 28,000 women in the UK every year, the pressure is on for women, particularly those over 40, to have regular mammograms
.Do mammograms help to save lives?
NO.
A Swedish study, involving nearly 250,000 women found no survival advantage in women under 50 with regular mammograms (Lancet 2002, 359-90919).
Are mammograms accurate?
The latest research shows that more than one third of mammograms give false reading, with 64% rate of false positives (finding cancer present when it isnt) after 10 mammograms (N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:1089-96). The test is accurate less than half the time in the second half of a womens menstrual cycle (Cancer, 1997; 80:720-4). Mammography is crude, picking up many benign tumors that would do no harm if left alone. This can falsely raise the incidence of breast cancer by as much as one half (Lancet, 1992;339:810). Routine screening could be behind the huge increase in aggressive treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (40,000 cases in the USA alone). This cancer spreads, at most, in 20% of cases (Breast j, 2000; 6:331-4) and some pathologists report that it simply burns itself out.
Do Mammograms Actually CAUSE Breast Cancer?
John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., has concluded that at least 66% of breast cancer cases are caused by radiation exposure (including that from mammograms). I don't know how he arrived at that number, but you can't argue with his credentials. Dr. Gofman worked for decades at Livermore (a foremost radiation studies laboratory). And he was chosen by the Atomic Energy Commission to head their studies on the effects of radiation.
It wouldn't be surprising if mammograms contribute to cancer. The female breast is highly sensitive to radiation. Compared to other cancer sites, the breasts are 2 to 3 times more vulnerable to cancer from radiation. But not only are mammograms potentially dangerous, they're also highly unreliable. In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70% of the "tumors" detected by mammograms turned out not to be tumors. And according to the National Cancer Intsitute (NCI), mammograms miss the real thing 40% of the time.
The NCI has been campaigning for women to get a mammogram every year, starting at age 40. But given their questionable benefit and proven risks, I would advise against it. Instead, consider a monthly breast self-examination (BSE), and see a trained health professional every year for a clinical breast examination (CBE).
- Jon Herring
WHAT CAN YOU DO INSTEAD?
Examine your own breasts monthly and have a health professional do it annually. According to the American Cancer Society, 90% of all cancers are found by self-examination. Mammograms offer no benefit to women trained to examine themselves and who are also given yearly examinations by a trained health professional (Lancet, 2000; 356:1087). Self-examinations are also more accurate (N Engl J Med, 1998; 338:1089-96). If you have to have a lump checked out, a safer alternative, without the dangers of radiation is high resolution digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) or ultra sound screening carried out by an experienced operator. DITI, due to its ability to find new blood vessel growth in an area where a tumor is forming, can detect the beginnings of breast disease up to ten years prior to mammography. Oncologists agree that breast cancer found early is very curable. Our research indicates that when found this early, the need for traditional chemo or radiation treatments are not necessary through advanced Biophysics technology.
